Showing posts with label Child Support. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Child Support. Show all posts

Monday, April 5, 2021

Our Greatest Advancement in 2020: Being Human

By Tony McDowell, Deputy Friend of the Court, 7th Circuit Court (Genesee County)

Looking back at how courts have changed in 2020, it is easy to see the technological changes.  Courts have surged forward with amazing advancements.  It wasn’t long ago that ‘zoom’ was something your camera did, and being “in a waiting room” meant you were going to have to sit on an uncomfortable chair while looking at an old Sports Illustrated.  Now, for those of us in Michigan courts, Zoom video conferencing is how we do much of our work, and we have all gotten used to the virtual waiting room.  COVID-19 forced all of us working in the judiciary to evolve and become more comfortable with Zoom and many other remote work technologies.  Although for most of us Zoom is simply a computer program we are now required to use to conduct hearings and meetings, for some of us Zoom has become so much more.  It has become how we connect to each other and to those we serve.

Friday, March 30, 2018

Michigan Tribal Judicial Forum Builds Trust and Spurs Cooperation on Child Support Issues in Southwest Michigan

By MSC Public Information Office

Chief Judge Michael Petoskey is very familiar with Michigan tribal courts.

Although he currently serves as the Chief Judge for both the Pokagon Band of Potawatomi Indians and the Match-E- Be-Nash-She-Wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians, Chief Judge Petoskey has served on the bench for all seven of Michigan’s Lower Peninsula tribes during his career since first being appointed in 1985 as Chief Judge of his own Tribe, The Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians.

Monday, December 19, 2016

C03's Pre-Judgment Pilot Program

By John Frasik, Director of Family Assessment, Mediation, and Education

On May 12, 2016, the 3rd Circuit Court launched its Pre-Judgment Pilot Program.  A committee led by Judge Kathleen McCarthy, Presiding Judge of the Family Division, developed the program to determine whether conference-style meetings that actively involve parents, legal counsel, and an assigned judicial team including the referee, mental health clinician, and support specialist will result in more positive outcomes for families and reduce recurring litigation.  The team approach allows the parties to build a relationship of trust with each other and the friend of the court. 

The team is working with Oakland University on a formal research project that will track the cases over a two-year period to compare the level of litigation on pilot program cases with traditionally litigated pre-judgment cases.  In addition to tracking the success of conference-style meetings versus traditional litigation, the pilot program streamlines the traditional process used by the Wayne County Friend of the Court to handle pre-judgment motion filings. 

Traditionally, when pre-judgment motions involving custody or parenting time without child support are filed, the assigned referee conducts a hearing and issues a recommendation addressing the non-child support issues.  When a pre-judgment motion/objection is filed requesting child support, a referee hearing is scheduled on the court’s expedited docket.  The parties first meet with a domestic relations referee who discusses child support and other issues such as custody and parenting time.  Ultimately, the domestic relations referee makes a temporary recommendation addressing custody, child support, and parenting time.  The parties may accept or reject the recommendation.  If either party objects to any of the issues addressed in the friend of the court recommendation, they appear before a referee who hears arguments on the record and ultimately issues a recommendation within 21 days.  Parties must file any objection within 21 days of the date the recommendation was mailed to them. 

Because the referee, mental health expert, and support specialist are present during the conference, regardless of the relief requested in the parties’ motion, the parties will address custody, child support, and parenting time issues pursuant to MCL 722.24(1), as well as any other issues.  The pilot program is set up to be much less intimidating for litigants, especially those who are not represented, with all participants sitting together at the table.  Parties are scheduled for a pilot-program conference in a dedicated time slot and do not have the stress of competing with other cases or “airing their dirty laundry” in open court.  They are also given the contact information for their team.

Monday, August 15, 2016

20th Circuit Court -- Ottawa County -- Committed to Helping Parents Stay Employed to Pay Child Support

Posted by State Court Administrative Office on Aug 15, 2016 1:41:02 PM

By SCAO Friend of the Court Bureau Interns

Paying child support can often be a frustrating and difficult undertaking, particularly when the parent who is required to pay encounters financial difficulty. Some of those parents might even feel like they are being negatively judged and told, “Get a job, you lazy bum!”

Although the Child Support Program strives to treat all parties with respect at every step of the child support process, this is the impression that some payers take away from an order to show cause for failure to pay child support. Parties may petition for a modification of the support order, but