Friday, October 4, 2019

A Personal View: Project Access -- A Collaborative Expungement Clinic


By Judge Michelle Rick, 29th Circuit Court (Clinton and Gratiot Counties)

I have been a circuit court judge since 2007 and an adjunct law professor at the University of Detroit Mercy School of Law since 2015.  I teach a class called “Access to Justice,” where students learn about the civil and criminal justice gap, and innovations that are used to lessen the gap.  In December 2018, I combined my two roles to create a traveling expungement clinic, which came to be named Project Access [see related article about Michigan Legal Help’s role].   Project Access was designed to be a one-stop shop where law students, volunteer lawyers, courts and their staff, law enforcement, and other community volunteers would join together to bring civil justice relief to six rural counties in central and Mid-Michigan. 



Judge Rick speaking during the Project Access kickoff news
conference alongside Chief Justice Bridget McCormack
and Detroit Mercy Law Dean Phyllis Crocker
Detroit Mercy Law School obtained a grant from the Michigan State Bar Foundation to fund Project Access.  The grant was used to enable eight law students, two full-time Detroit Mercy Law faculty, and me to travel over 10 days to six counties in central and northern Michigan.   Grant proceeds were also expended to cover expungement clinic costs such as ICHAT fees, paper, supplies, postage, and other miscellaneous expenses.  Our group’s journey began on July 25 at the Hall of Justice with a media kick-off, and we ended on August 2 in Gaylord.  We caravanned to six counties (Gratiot, Wexford, Missaukee, Crawford, Kalkaska, and Otsego), where we convened five expungement clinics. 

Project Access court partners included Judge Audrey Van Alst (28th Circuit), Judge Colin Hunter (46th Circuit), and me (29th Circuit); our respective court staff; local clerks; county sheriffs; pro bono lawyers; and many other court and community volunteers.  The 28th Circuit (Wexford and Missaukee counties) held a one-day combined expungement clinic at the DHHS offices in Cadillac.  The remaining clinics were held in circuit courtrooms in Ithaca, Grayling, Kalkaska, and Gaylord.  At each location, students and volunteer lawyers set up stations to screen applicants, run criminal histories, complete expungement applications, obtain hearing dates, copy and assemble filings, and then debrief applicants on what to expect when they returned for their expungement hearing. 

As noted in the related article, the Michigan Legal Help expungement tool was absolutely critical to support our efforts.  Local county clerks waived fees for certified copies of convictions.  Local law enforcement agencies waived costs for fingerprinting litigants.  IT staff were on standby to trouble shoot.  Court and county employees served as notaries and guides; others donated lunch for the volunteers involved.  Project Access was also generously supported and promoted by Chief Justice Bridget McCormack, Court of Appeals Judges Chris Murray and Mike Riordan, SCAO Region IV Administrator Jerome Kole, and the Office of Public Information (Court Relations Program Coordinator Lynn Seaks, in particular).  We couldn’t have done it without them!

Suffice it to say, before Project Access, I had little appreciation for the complexities associated with obtaining an expungement.  There are many hoops to jump through.  It is laborious.  For those who hire counsel, it can also be very expensive.  On March 16, 2019, researchers J.J. Prescott and Sonya Starr from the University of Michigan Law School issued a report entitled “Expungement of Criminal Convictions: An Empirical Study”.[1]  The report is based exclusively on expungements in Michigan.  One noteworthy finding was that only 6.5 percent of the persons eligible for an expungement seek it within 5 years of eligibility.  This likely explains why expungement hearings appear infrequently on my docket.  The report analyzed how persons who obtain expungements see an increase in wages, and that people who obtain expungements have a low likelihood of recidivism.  We know as judges that people with criminal convictions face difficulties obtaining employment, finding and maintaining suitable housing, and qualifying for public benefits, including housing, food assistance, and student loans.  Expungements offer opportunities to those who have paid their debt to society and otherwise atoned for their past wrongs.

Project Access is proof that large-scale, multi-county collaboration with a variety of stakeholders can achieve positive results.  Everyone connected with Project Access worked with the common goal of helping low-income, rural Michiganders, many of whom find themselves in the civil justice gap.  The experience was remarkable.  I will admit, at times during the planning stage of Project Access I felt uncertain.  I worried this was too massive an undertaking to be successful.  I am glad I ignored those thoughts.  Project Access was a success story in collaboration for all involved.  I would rate it as one of the best over my entire legal career.