Data is
power! SCAO’s Child Welfare Services
Division (CWS) recently updated the Court Improvement Program (CIP) data
reports, which are designed to leverage your data, increase efficiency, and
improve processes in neglect/abuse (NA) cases. These reports are an effective way to analyze
efforts to help children and families successfully achieve permanency. The purpose of the CIP
is to (1) promote the continuous quality improvement of child protective proceedings,
and (2) enhance and expand collaboration between the judicial branch, the
Michigan Department of Health and Human Services (MDHHS), attorneys, and tribes
to improve child welfare outcomes. CIP data reports are automatically
generated through the Judicial Data Warehouse (JDW) using information from the
court’s case management system and MDHHS. Courts can easily use the data reports to evaluate
hearing timeliness in child protective proceedings.
The CIP Data Reports are the result of
a data share agreement between CWS and MDHHS.
This collaboration has allowed the CIP to create 13 data reports that
measure child protective cases and aid the courts in achieving timely
permanency for youth under court jurisdiction. In addition to the 13 CIP data reports, the
JDW maintains a CIP Data Snapshot, which provides a high-level assessment of
open NA cases for each county as well as a Child Well-Being Data Report that
tracks frequency of parenting time, required caseworker contacts, and
children’s medical and dental visits. The
CIP data reports are located within the JDW at http://nsa.courts.michigan.gov/.
Transition
to CIP
Courts that use TCS or PCS for
management support are no longer required to submit an annual Permanency
Indicators Report (PIR) to SCAO, requiring less administrative burden for
counties. Remaining courts that would
like to stop submitting PIR data may set their own timeline for transition. When ready, remaining courts can contact Optum
Government Solutions (JDW_helpdesk@courts.mi.gov) to discuss the data feed necessary
to populate the CIP data reports.
CIP
reports are only available to family division judges, court staff, and agency
staff who handle child protective cases. The reports provide case-specific detail about
children under court jurisdiction so the court can focus its post-dispositional
efforts on achieving permanency. Each
authorized user will only have access to cases in his/her county. SCAO monitors use of the JDW to ensure it is
being used for stated purposes only.
Effective
Use of CIP Data Reports
·
Review foster care case management information
from MDHHS.
·
Assess whether hearings are held timely. Courts are encouraged to review cases that do
not meet established timeframes to determine why the hearings are delayed.
·
Use the information to develop policies or
procedures to improve court practice and prevent delays.
·
Evaluate what permanency goals are used most
frequently in a jurisdiction and how long on average it takes to achieve each
goal.
·
Pinpoint outlier cases to address issues and
concerns that impact that case and future cases.
·
Prioritize cases based on length of time a
child has been in care.
·
Utilize the data snapshot to get a big picture
idea of where the court may need to take a more in-depth look to improve
outcomes for children and court procedures.
Next
Steps
Using
both case management data and CIP data will help the court monitor child protective
cases from initiation until permanency.
Used in concert, these data tools supply valuable insight into court
practice. In order to establish a data-driven
court, each local court is encouraged to form a court data team and make sure
team members have access to the JDW and case management system. Court teams should plan together to set
specific goals to help measure performance in terms of timeliness of hearings
and achieving meaningful permanency. We
also recommend that courts engage in active case monitoring using monthly case
management reports and CIP reports.
Court staff can use the reports to prioritize hearings, schedule next
hearing dates, close cases properly, and monitor data-entry practices. Finally, courts are encouraged to engage staff
in brainstorming and problem solving to create new efficiencies in court docket
management.
Data
that is reviewed on a regular basis will lead to improved court practices and outcomes
for families. Accurate reporting and
analysis of child welfare systems data will open the door to improved services
for children and families by our courts, and that is power!
Erin House is a court analyst in SCAO’s Child Welfare Services (CWS) division. She earned her bachelor degree from Michigan State University in 1999 and law degree from the University of Toledo in 2002.
Mrs. House worked in CWS from 2004-2008 and returned in 2017. Prior to her time at CWS, she was in private practice and focused on child protection and juvenile delinquency cases. She can be reached at HouseE@courts.mi.gov.